Marking Criteria (Log) (Ext)

This is the marking criteria of the Process Log in History Extension.

  • Consistency of log updates
  • Relevant and analytical commentary that reflects consistent progress.
  • References to sources

Weighting = 5/40

Marking Schemata

Mastering

16 – 20
  • A comprehensive description of procedures and the sequential development of the project  (E2.2),
  • Sophisticated analytical and coherent review of the cumulative self, peer and techer evaluation of the project. (E2.1)
Consolidating

11 – 15
  • A detailed description of procedures and the sequential development of the project. (E2.2)
  • A thorough analytical and coherent review of the cumulative self, peer and teacher evaluation of the project. (E.2.1)
Developing

6 – 10
  • Identifies some of the procedures and sequential development of the project. (E.2.2)
  • An attempt at analytical review of the cumulative self, peer and teacher evaluation of the project. (E2.1)
Not Achieving

0 – 5
  • Limited identification of some of the procedures and development of the project. (E.2.2)
  • A basic review of self, peer and teacher evaluation of the project. (E.2.1)
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.